Best Investment Ideas and Best Safe Investments for 2012

The two most often posed inquiries by financial backers are:

What speculation would it be a good idea for me to purchase?
Is currently the ideal opportunity to get it?
A great many people need to know how 智能投資 to recognize the ideal venture with flawless timing, since they accept that is the way to fruitful financial planning. Allow me to come clean with you that is a long way from: regardless of whether you could find the solutions to those questions right, you would just have a half opportunity to make your venture effective. Allow me to make sense of.

There are two key powerhouses that can prompt the achievement or disappointment of any venture:

Outside factors: these are the business sectors and venture execution overall. For instance:
The reasonable exhibition of that specific speculation over the long haul;
Whether that market will go up or down, and when it will alter starting with one course then onto the next.
Inner variables: these are the financial backer’s own inclination, experience and limit. For instance:
Which speculation you have greater partiality with and have a history of earning substantial sums of money in;
What limit you need to clutch a venture during awful times;
What assessment benefits do you have which can assist with overseeing income;
What level of chance you can endure without having a tendency to settle on alarm choices.
At the point when we are taking a gander at a specific venture, we can’t just glance at the graphs or exploration reports to choose what to contribute and when to contribute, we want to take a gander at ourselves and figure out what works for us as a person.

We should take a gander at a couple of guides to show my perspective here. These can show you why speculation hypotheses frequently don’t work, in actuality, since they are an examination of the outer elements, and financial backers can generally represent the moment of truth these hypotheses themselves because of their singular distinctions (for example inward factors).

Model 1: Pick the best speculation at that point.

Most speculation counsels I have seen make a suspicion that in the event that the venture performs well, any financial backer can earn substantial sums of money out of it. As such, the outside factors alone decide the return.

I don’t think so. Consider these for instance:

Have you known about an occasion where two property financial backers purchased indistinguishable properties one next to the other in a similar road simultaneously? One earns substantial sums of money in lease with a decent occupant and sells it at a decent benefit later; different has a lot of lower lease with a terrible inhabitant and unloads it at a bad time later. They can be both utilizing a similar property the executives specialist, a similar selling specialist, a similar bank for finance, and getting a similar counsel from a similar speculation guide.

You might have likewise seen share financial backers who purchased similar offers simultaneously, one is compelled to unload theirs at a bad time because of individual conditions and different sells them for a benefit at a superior time.

I have even seen a similar developer building 5 indistinguishable houses next to each other for 5 financial backers. One required a half year longer to work than the other 4, and he wound up offering it at some unacceptable time because of individual income pressures while others are improving monetarily.
What is the sole contrast in the above cases? The financial backers themselves (for example the inner variables).

Throughout the long term I have explored the monetary places of two or three thousand financial backers actually. At the point when individuals ask me what speculation they ought to get into at a specific second, they anticipate that I should look at offers, properties, and other resource classes to encourage them how to dispense their cash.

My solution to them is to continuously request that they return to their history first. I would request that they list down every one of the speculations they have made: cash, shares, choices, prospects, properties, property advancement, property redesign, and so on and request that they let me know which one got them the most cash-flow and which one didn’t. Then, at that point, I recommend to them to adhere to the victors and cut the washouts. At the end of the day, I advise them to put more in what has earned substantial sums of money before and quit putting resources into what has not made them any cash previously (expecting their cash will get a 5% return each year sitting in the bank, they need to basically beat that while doing the correlation).

Assuming you carve out opportunity to do that activity for yourself, you will rapidly find your number one speculation to put resources into, so you can focus your assets on getting the best return instead of allotting any of them to the failures.

You might request my reasoning in picking speculations this way as opposed to taking a gander at the hypotheses of expansion or portfolio the board, as most others do. I essentially accept the law of nature administers numerous things past our logical comprehension; and it isn’t brilliant to conflict with the law of nature.

For instance, have you at any point saw that sardines swim together in the sea? Furthermore, correspondingly so do the sharks. In a characteristic backwoods, comparable trees become together as well. This is the possibility that comparable things draw in one another as they have proclivity with one another.